Comments on: 2nd Summary Judgment In ACSI v. Stearns http://missingthepoint.wordpress.com/2008/08/10/2nd-summary-judgment-in-acsi-v-stearns/ I think we're all missing it. Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:55:43 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Voice in the Wilderness http://missingthepoint.wordpress.com/2008/08/10/2nd-summary-judgment-in-acsi-v-stearns/#comment-162 Voice in the Wilderness Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:13:59 +0000 http://missingthepoint.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-162 I don't know why Larry is bothering to tell you to get off of his blog. It is now totally censored as Larry is terrified by conflicting statements. You are always kicking Larry's ass. That's why he doesn't like you. I don’t know why Larry is bothering to tell you to get off of his blog. It is now totally censored as Larry is terrified by conflicting statements.

You are always kicking Larry’s ass. That’s why he doesn’t like you.

]]> By: Larry Fafarman http://missingthepoint.wordpress.com/2008/08/10/2nd-summary-judgment-in-acsi-v-stearns/#comment-103 Larry Fafarman Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:42:04 +0000 http://missingthepoint.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-103 I MEANT WHAT I SAID -- I WANT YOU TO GET THE HELL OFF MY BLOG. I MEANT WHAT I SAID — I WANT YOU TO GET THE HELL OFF MY BLOG.

]]> By: Larry Fafarman http://missingthepoint.wordpress.com/2008/08/10/2nd-summary-judgment-in-acsi-v-stearns/#comment-102 Larry Fafarman Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:41:32 +0000 http://missingthepoint.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-102 KEVIN, GET THE HELL OFF MY BLOG, YOU WORTHLESS SACK OF SHIT. KEVIN, GET THE HELL OFF MY BLOG, YOU WORTHLESS SACK OF SHIT.

]]> By: Lou FCD http://missingthepoint.wordpress.com/2008/08/10/2nd-summary-judgment-in-acsi-v-stearns/#comment-88 Lou FCD Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:43:02 +0000 http://missingthepoint.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-88 Good ol' Larry. Always good for a laugh. Good ol’ Larry. Always good for a laugh.

]]> By: larryfarma http://missingthepoint.wordpress.com/2008/08/10/2nd-summary-judgment-in-acsi-v-stearns/#comment-87 larryfarma Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:19:45 +0000 http://missingthepoint.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-87 Kevin, you lousy dunghill, stop messing up my blog with your crap. Just giving you a taste of your own medicine. Kevin, you lousy dunghill, stop messing up my blog with your crap.

Just giving you a taste of your own medicine.

]]> By: W. Kevin Vicklund http://missingthepoint.wordpress.com/2008/08/10/2nd-summary-judgment-in-acsi-v-stearns/#comment-86 W. Kevin Vicklund Mon, 25 Aug 2008 22:25:48 +0000 http://missingthepoint.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-86 I had been waiting for Larry to note my error here before making my correction, so that he could take proper credit. Unfortunately, his comment was flagged by Wordpress's anti-spam filter and so was delayed in posting - I am not notified by Wordpress when there is spam in the queue (a relief, because I get 10 times as much spam as I do real messages). I am leaving the other typos alone for now. I had been waiting for Larry to note my error here before making my correction, so that he could take proper credit. Unfortunately, his comment was flagged by WordPress’s anti-spam filter and so was delayed in posting – I am not notified by WordPress when there is spam in the queue (a relief, because I get 10 times as much spam as I do real messages). I am leaving the other typos alone for now.

]]> By: larryfarma http://missingthepoint.wordpress.com/2008/08/10/2nd-summary-judgment-in-acsi-v-stearns/#comment-81 larryfarma Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:31:16 +0000 http://missingthepoint.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-81 Kevin, your following statement (from the "reasonableness" section of your post) is wrong: --"The untimely expert witness reports excluded as untimely, ACSI had no admissible evidence that any of the four [actually five] courses were unreasonably rejected. "-- The judge accepted plaintiffs ' expert witness reports on those five courses as timely and used those reports in ruling on those courses (pages 12-18 of the opinion). A review of the final decision is now on my blog at the top of a post-label list of ten posts about the case -- see http://im-from-missouri.blogspot.com/search/label/ACSI%20v.%20Stearns Kevin, your following statement (from the “reasonableness” section of your post) is wrong:

–”The untimely expert witness reports excluded as untimely, ACSI had no admissible evidence that any of the four [actually five] courses were unreasonably rejected. “–

The judge accepted plaintiffs ‘ expert witness reports on those five courses as timely and used those reports in ruling on those courses (pages 12-18 of the opinion).

A review of the final decision is now on my blog at the top of a post-label list of ten posts about the case — see

http://im-from-missouri.blogspot.com/search/label/ACSI%20v.%20Stearns

]]> By: U.C. wins ACSI case « Tony’s curricublog http://missingthepoint.wordpress.com/2008/08/10/2nd-summary-judgment-in-acsi-v-stearns/#comment-78 U.C. wins ACSI case « Tony’s curricublog Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:57:53 +0000 http://missingthepoint.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-78 [...] http://missingthepoint.wordpress.com/2008/08/10/2nd-summary-judgment-in-acsi-v-stearns/ Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Texas Supreme Court immunizes exorcismLaw and religion and malpractice in the classroom: Teacher, Parent sitesGlobal and trasnational law schoolsUCC - University of California Student Exchange Programme This entry was written by Tony Whitson and posted on August 12, 2008 at 3:48 pm and filed under Constitutional law, Education, Education Law & Policy, Evolution, Higher Education, Religion, Science, blog, creationism, jaw. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL. « “Behold: the atheist’s nightmare” (a banana) [ video ] #1 Genesis expert offers help for Louisiana science education » [...] [...] http://missingthepoint.wordpress.com/2008/08/10/2nd-summary-judgment-in-acsi-v-stearns/ Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Texas Supreme Court immunizes exorcismLaw and religion and malpractice in the classroom: Teacher, Parent sitesGlobal and trasnational law schoolsUCC – University of California Student Exchange Programme This entry was written by Tony Whitson and posted on August 12, 2008 at 3:48 pm and filed under Constitutional law, Education, Education Law & Policy, Evolution, Higher Education, Religion, Science, blog, creationism, jaw. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL. « “Behold: the atheist’s nightmare” (a banana) [ video ] #1 Genesis expert offers help for Louisiana science education » [...]

]]> By: The morality of defection · http://missingthepoint.wordpress.com/2008/08/10/2nd-summary-judgment-in-acsi-v-stearns/#comment-77 The morality of defection · Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:43:48 +0000 http://missingthepoint.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-77 [...] & Bags News » News News 2nd Summary Judgment In ACSI v. Stearns2008-08-13 14:43:42Requirement so the standing that can be waived, but there is a constitutional [...] [...] & Bags News » News News 2nd Summary Judgment In ACSI v. Stearns2008-08-13 14:43:42Requirement so the standing that can be waived, but there is a constitutional [...]

]]> By: Peter http://missingthepoint.wordpress.com/2008/08/10/2nd-summary-judgment-in-acsi-v-stearns/#comment-73 Peter Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:22:19 +0000 http://missingthepoint.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-73 I look forward to reading more and keeping my readers up to date. Rock it. I look forward to reading more and keeping my readers up to date. Rock it.

]]>